X gon give it to ya greentext
Ultimately I joined them for one more game session, 'Paranoia' was the game I think, but I did decide that their play style wasn't compatible with mine.
X gon give it to ya greentext trial#
I rolled terribly during the fight but still beat him into unconsciousness - druid vs mage it was never in doubt - but despite the trial of combat concluding that the mage was a mass murderer there would be no punishment aside from my bruising my hands on his mid-section. Instead it was decided that the matter would be decided by an unarmed no-magic trial by combat. Annoyingly the party had made themselves rulers of the town and they weren't inclined to allow a proper trial followed by punishment. Then I publicly called out the mage and made my case to the crowd. I meticulously went through the available evidence, interviewed suspects and witnesses and identified major holes in the official timeline of events.
So the DM decided to use that as the hook to introduce my character.
X gon give it to ya greentext full#
On the session I began, but before I was introduced, the party's 'lawful good' mage burned a building full of gnomes and used magic to convince one of the survivors that she had done it and get her to confess. i don't know where you got that idea, other than the fact that i had the audacity to criticise bestiality with a feral creature.I briefly played a gnome druid in a campaign I was considering joining. In summary, what i am reading from your argument is "well, if we're gonna kill her anyway, we might as well have some fun." while this is probably an exaggeration, i hope you can see why that might be discomforting.Īs an addendum: stop calling me a pedophile when i'm not even all that interested in humans in the first place. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it. one provides food, leather, and other equipment, while the other fulfills a sick and selfish desire. I could argue that comparing the harvesting of animals to the raping of them isn't appropriate. if that is what you believed, then that would be a basic fault in logic.Īnimals have feelings too, you emotionally handicapped invalid. this isn't a binary thing where one justifies the other. my argument is that it is still wrong to do it to some poor animal.
Yes, you are correct it is worse to molest children.